Repertoire Survey Results

In January, a repertoire survey was launched on this website. In April, I shared the same questions from that survey with a group of ensemble directors at the PMEA Professional Development Conference. The data from each group in an of itself was interesting, but the comparison between the two groups yielded some unique findings as it applies to the evaluation and selection of repertoire for ensembles.

This study compares the repertoire evaluation and selection processes of ensemble directors who engage in online forums versus those who participate in professional development conferences. The survey results highlight significant differences in organizational habits, piece-type preferences, and the role of repertoire in meeting curricular goals. Online forum directors tend to favor original works and emerging repertoire, indicating a progressive approach, while conference directors prefer classical/core repertoire works, reflecting a more traditional stance. The study also reveals that online forum directors place higher importance on non-musical concepts such as societal relevance and relationships, whereas conference directors emphasize emotional growth. These findings suggest that the mode of survey engagement may reveal insight into directors’ choices and habits, with implications for professional development and repertoire selection strategies. The study underscores the need for continuous professional development to enhance repertoire selection practices.

To read the full survey results, please click here to download a PDF.

For additional clarity on the study, questions about specific questions, or to discuss repertoire further please contact me here. My thanks and appreciation to the many ensemble directors who contributed to these surveys and advanced our profession with their input!